The statistics are grim. An even more microscopic group, just 0. In other words, most businesses start small and stay there. But if that's not good enough for you—or if you recognize that staying small doesn't necessarily guarantee your business's survival— there are examples of companies out there that have successfully made the transition from start-up to small business to fully-thriving large business.
He gives new home automation products from Amazon and Google as examples of innovation and the next big thing in technology. This shows a misunderstanding of the different business models and product strategies of Apple and its services-oriented competitors.
GOOGL as examples of innovation and the next big thing in technology. Needless to say, I look at things differently. Both represent a logical way to offer an affordable, basic product to provide access to Amazon and Google services for the widest audience possible.
The internet giants play to their strengths here service infrastructure and data collection while limiting their weaknesses hardware and Apple inc long term strategy for growth - see Google Glass and Amazon Fire Phone.
On the other hand, Apple is a product company competing in the premium segment where rich experiences are positioned as the reason to attract customers.
The iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Apple TV and soon Mac if rumors are true already offer access to a virtual assistant and speakers, while also providing more interface options, utility, and overall value.
In fact, I think a product like the Apple Watch is best positioned for handling voice queries and home automation as its microphone and user interface is right on your wrist wherever you are. Does Apple need to improve Siri and other services?
Are Amazon Echo and Google Home the next big innovation with "a vast potential market" and a showcase for technology leadership? Either way, Apple, Amazon, and Google follow the same goals here trying to engage their customers within their ecosystems, but given their different business models and different strengths, they position different products to achieve them.
Blair then states that "Apple has ignored the compelling need in technology to look ahead and innovate". While the company makes a few bets, these are significant, long-term strategic initiatives. Apple Watch and Apple Pay are the clearest examples of this focused product strategy.
Similarly, the smartwatch category in terms of material units shipments was largely insignificant before the Apple Watch, while the Swiss and US watchmakers now suffer the biggest sales declines in almost a decade.
While the latter strategy results in many product and service initiatives, few of them ever see the light of day and even fewer become successful and profitable.
What is the better strategy? That depends on your definition of innovation and whether you prefer breadth or depth.
However, the notion that Apple does not look ahead and innovate is not correct, even more so now that the company is working with Didi Chuxing to redefine transportation. Apples and oranges Finally, Mr.
Both AMZN and GOOG certainly benefit from the positive sentiment surrounding their many initiatives while investors are glad to pay a premium for their recurring service cash flows and growth.
However, this is not to say that the company has stopped innovating.
The company is currently establishing itself in the important wearables and health markets, brings security and convenience to the payments industry, and its rumored electric vehicle is widely considered the worst-kept secret in Silicon Valley.
If you have enjoyed reading my article and found its content valuable, please take 5 seconds to follow me by clicking the Follow button next to my name at the top of the page.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it other than from Seeking Alpha. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. This is no recommendation to buy or sell securities as that carries with it very high risks.
The information contained in this article is for informational purposes only and subject to change at any time. Do your own due diligence and consult with a licensed professional before making any investment decision.
Follow Robert Lehar and get email alerts Your feedback matters to us! Want to share your opinion on this article? Disagree with this article?Why Apple Inc.
(AAPL) Needs to Change Its Long-Term Strategy Investors assume — rightfully so — that it is a mature company with no immediate growth prospects. If Apple slashed its. Apr 20, · The Netflix Inc.
application (app) displays the and "Orange is the New Black" series on an Apple Inc. iPhone 5s in this arranged photograph in Washington, D.C., U.S., on . “For anyone who is concerned about the importance of forcing longer-term objectives into a public company short-term mindset and who wants to learn more about some of the heroes of this effort, this book is a godsend.
Find the latest earnings growth forecast for Apple Inc. (AAPL) at initiativeblog.com These three product strategies you can lift from Apple's playbook and incorporate into your growing business.
3 Strategies to Adopt From Apple. of a single successful product for the long term. AAPL Long-term trading strategy: Quantitative (Bullish) - From a technical perspective, AAPL is still outperforming its benchmark (Technology Sector) in the long term.